David Cruz interviewed both Garvey School Board Member Bob Bruesch and Garvey School District Superintendent Dr. Sandra Johnson. The David Cruz Show can be heard weekdays from 3-6 PM on KTLK AM 1150 in Los Angeles.
The interview with Bob Bruesch occurred on October 31, 2012. It can be heard by clicking the link below.
David Cruz interview with Bob Bruesch
The interview with Dr. Johnson took place on November 5, 2012. It can be heard by clicking the link below.
David Cruz interview with Dr. Johnson
Next School Board Meeting - November 15, 2012 at 6:30PM - Location TBD
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Channel 11 Coverage of the October 24, 2012 "Town Hall" Meeting
Channel 11 News covered the District Sponsored "Town Hall" Meeting on October 23, 2012. Here is a the video from their newscast.
Los Angeles Local News, Weather, and Traffic
Thursday, October 11, 2012
How much is the Superintendent's pay increase costing the District?
There has been much discussion as to how much the salary increase of Dr. Sandra Johnson, in conjunction with her decision to come out of retirement after over 10 years, is costing the District.
Our calculation places the added annual cost at $42,549.63!
If anyone in the know can explain why this is inaccurate, please let us know.
Cost to the Garvey School District General Fund.
Salary
New Salary $170,000
Previous Salary $148,516
Net Difference $21,484
Doctoral Stipend (She was not previously receiving this stipend.)
$5,100
Payment to the State Teacher's Retirement System (STRS)
Since Dr Johnson decided to come out of retirement, the District must now pay 8.25% into the pension system on Dr. Johnson's behalf. No STRS payment was being made prior to the change in the contract. An equal payment was being made to an annuity instead. The School Board decided to continue the annuity despite the new payments to STRS. The annuity is considered creditable income and the District is paying 8.25% on it as well.
Dr. Johnson's total income for STRS includes $170,000 salary, $12,722.82 annuity, $5,100 Doctoral Stipend, $5,700 car allowance.
Total income - $193,522.82.
STRS Payment = $15,965.63 (8.25% of total income $193,522.82)
Total
$21,484 (Salary increase) + $5,100 (Doctoral Stipend) + $15,965.63 (STRS Payment) = $42,549.63
Our calculation places the added annual cost at $42,549.63!
If anyone in the know can explain why this is inaccurate, please let us know.
Cost to the Garvey School District General Fund.
Salary
New Salary $170,000
Previous Salary $148,516
Net Difference $21,484
Doctoral Stipend (She was not previously receiving this stipend.)
$5,100
Payment to the State Teacher's Retirement System (STRS)
Since Dr Johnson decided to come out of retirement, the District must now pay 8.25% into the pension system on Dr. Johnson's behalf. No STRS payment was being made prior to the change in the contract. An equal payment was being made to an annuity instead. The School Board decided to continue the annuity despite the new payments to STRS. The annuity is considered creditable income and the District is paying 8.25% on it as well.
Dr. Johnson's total income for STRS includes $170,000 salary, $12,722.82 annuity, $5,100 Doctoral Stipend, $5,700 car allowance.
Total income - $193,522.82.
STRS Payment = $15,965.63 (8.25% of total income $193,522.82)
Total
$21,484 (Salary increase) + $5,100 (Doctoral Stipend) + $15,965.63 (STRS Payment) = $42,549.63
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Channel 5 Coverage of School Board Meeting - October 4, 2012
Upset parents and community members attended the School Board Meeting on October 4, 2012. The event was covered by Channel 5 news.
Channel 11 Coverage of School Board Meeting - October 4, 2012
Upset parents and community members attended the School Board Meeting on October 4, 2012. The event was covered by Channel 11 news.
Los Angeles Local News, Weather, and Traffic
Los Angeles Local News, Weather, and Traffic
Monday, May 7, 2012
No Confidence
The membership of the Garvey Education Association voted "No Confidence" in Garvey School District Superintendent, Dr. Sandra Johnson last week.
Ninety-six percent of the teachers support the "No Confidence" Resolution.
Ninety-six percent of the teachers support the "No Confidence" Resolution.
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Contentious School Board Meeting
Emotions ran a bit hot at the last School Board Meeting on the 19th. The meeting was held at Bitely School to accommodate the large crowd.
The San Gabriel Valley Tribune ran an article about the meeting. It can be found at the following link.
http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_20446227/parents-teachers-voice-opposition-garvey-school-district-management
There are some inaccuracies, but you get the idea.
The San Gabriel Valley Tribune ran an article about the meeting. It can be found at the following link.
http://www.sgvtribune.com/news/ci_20446227/parents-teachers-voice-opposition-garvey-school-district-management
There are some inaccuracies, but you get the idea.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
200 at the last Board Meeting
Over 200 people attended the last School Board Meeting on March 29th. Many were protesting Superintendent Johnson and the School Board's decision to remove Principal Collaso from Willard School.
Mrs. Collaso has worked closely with teachers and parents to help raise test scores and win a Title 1 AA Award in 2011.
The next meeting will be on April 19th at 6:30 PM.
The Truth About Garvey
A blogger simply named Garvey Teacher has been writing about the situation we all find ourselves in here at the Garvey School District. The blog is called "The Truth About Garvey." Two of the blog entries are especially pertinent here.
The first is entitled "Collaboration is Dead." It speaks about the Garvey School District Local Educational Agency Plan.
The second is entitled "The Budget Committee."
To read the entire blog, click here.
The first is entitled "Collaboration is Dead." It speaks about the Garvey School District Local Educational Agency Plan.
The second is entitled "The Budget Committee."
To read the entire blog, click here.
The Illusion of Collaboration
The Leadership Team
1. Garvey teachers spent a couple
of Wednesdays working on master schedule ideas at the
behest or the school’s leadership team via
administration. In the end, these ideas were not used
and the parameters were set by administration.
2. Early in the leadership team process, Garvey teachers considered having the leadership team lead Wednesday Collaboration Sessions. The principal said it would be inappropriate for the leadership team to run the collaboration meetings because she runs the leadership team and she would therefore have to lead the Wednesday meetings. The leadership team does not exist without her.
As hard working as all the teachers serving on leadership teams are, their function is essentially "assistant to the principal." No collaboration here, just working administration's agenda, through chosen teachers.
Before
Dr.
Johnson’s arrival, the teachers at Garvey School District schools decided who they would
like to represent them on their school site leadership
team. That all changed with the arrival of
Superintendent Johnson.
o
Leadership teams were slipped in during the summer.
o
The Leadership Teams are now
chosen by administration and are essentially an arm of
administration. They do as they are told and at some
schools, teams have been chastised for leaking
information to other teachers.
o
Teachers have no say as to
what topics are to be discussed because they are
simply carrying out the agenda of administration.
o
The leadership teams are
perfect examples of the appearance of teacher input,
but the bottom line is administration gets what they
want, one way or another. Administration knows what
their end objectives are and if the work the
leadership team doesn’t fit the objective, it is
thrown out. If it does fit, the team is congratulated
for their hard work.
Two examples from Garvey
Intermediate.
2. Early in the leadership team process, Garvey teachers considered having the leadership team lead Wednesday Collaboration Sessions. The principal said it would be inappropriate for the leadership team to run the collaboration meetings because she runs the leadership team and she would therefore have to lead the Wednesday meetings. The leadership team does not exist without her.
As hard working as all the teachers serving on leadership teams are, their function is essentially "assistant to the principal." No collaboration here, just working administration's agenda, through chosen teachers.
Parents Go Unheard
Superintendent
Johnson and the School Board disregard parental and
community input at Board Meetings.
In the Spring of 2011, parents attended several Board Meetings and spoke in favor of continuing the successful Honors Program at Garvey Intermediate.
Dr. Johnson stated the School board does not get involved in curricular issues. She stated the decision would be made by the site principal, but the principal did not make the decision.
The Honors Program was cut in half at the Superintendent's direction and the School Board's full knowledge and acquiescence.
Acquiescence is not leadership.
In the Spring of 2011, parents attended several Board Meetings and spoke in favor of continuing the successful Honors Program at Garvey Intermediate.
Dr. Johnson stated the School board does not get involved in curricular issues. She stated the decision would be made by the site principal, but the principal did not make the decision.
The Honors Program was cut in half at the Superintendent's direction and the School Board's full knowledge and acquiescence.
Acquiescence is not leadership.
Unjustified Layoffs
The
District has a 14.5% reserve, totaling over $6.5
million, but they have cut over 30 teachers.
These excessive cuts must be stopped.
Despite
being in a terrible financial situation at the state
level, the District has managed to increase its bottom
line to a 14.5% reserve. They have also laid off over
30 teachers. Declining ADA
and other factors do not justify this many RIF notices. Peoples lives should not be disrupted unnecessarily. Rescind the RIFs.
These excessive cuts must be stopped.
Safety
Superintendent
Johnson and the School Board disregarded the safety of
students and employees during the windstorms and a
water main break.
o
During the wind storms, two
of the Garvey District schools were without power.
This also meant no heat. Superintendent Johnson
decided to leave these schools open. She said it was
“an adventure.” Teachers and students had to navigate
dark hallways and bathrooms and rooms with windows
that didn’t face the sun were very dark.
o
After the first day, GEA
asked the superintendent to cancel classes the
following day for safety reasons. It was dangerous
getting to and from school without even considering a
day at school in the dark. The Alhambra
police department recommended that Alhambra
schools close and they did. Rosemead also
closed their schools, but Garvey remained open. Again,
the district made its decision without regard for
others. There was power at the District Office.
o
On another day, the water
main broke at Rice School. The
students were sent home, but teachers had to remain on
duty even though there was no running water.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)